Quoting%20commentary for Ketubot 95:3

רבי יהודה אומר אפילו עני שבישראל וכו': מכלל דת"ק סבר הני לא היכי דמי אי דאורחה מ"ט דת"ק דאמר לא ואי דלאו אורחה מ"ט דר"י

Judah ruled: even the poorest man in Israel etc. This then implies that the first Tanna is of the opinion that these are not [necessary]. But how is one to imagine [the case]? If it was her customs, why would the first opinion say he is not liable? And if it is not her custom, then what is R. Judah’s reasoning?

Explore quoting%20commentary for Ketubot 95:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.